President Trump just received what might as well be an early Christmas present, and it’s all thanks to the good folks over in Nebraska. While most of us were busy watching the eclipse, Nebraska was making moves that could potentially tip the scales in favor of Trump for the 2024 showdown.
Here’s the scoop: A bill, known as LB 764, is making its rounds in the Cornhusker State, courtesy of Senator Loren Lippincott (R-NE). This isn’t just any old piece of legislation; it’s a game changer that aims to toss Nebraska’s current electoral vote allocation system into the history books and replace it with a winner-take-all (WTA) system. For those keeping score at home, this means that instead of dividing electoral votes by congressional district, the state would award all its votes to the statewide winner.
Now, why is this such a big deal for Trump, you ask? Well, under the current system, Democrats have managed to snag an electoral vote from the Omaha district not once, but twice – first with Barack Obama in 2008 and then with Joe Biden in 2020. But with LB 764, Nebraska’s looking to join the ranks of 48 other states that say, “Thanks, but no thanks” to splitting electoral votes and opt for a unified front instead.
Governor Jim Pillen, a man clearly not afraid to stir the pot, has thrown his weight behind the bill, declaring, “I am steadfast in my commitment to get winner-take-all over the finish line.” He’s so gung-ho, in fact, that he’s promised to sign WTA into law faster than you can say “Make America Great Again,” despite a temporary hiccup in gathering enough support during the regular legislative session.
But here’s where it gets juicy: If Trump can clinch victories in Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada – as current polls suggest he might – he’d still be one electoral vote shy of a win. Enter Nebraska’s WTA bill, stage right. By consolidating all of Nebraska’s electoral votes for the statewide winner, the GOP could snag a crucial advantage in what’s shaping up to be a nail-biter of an election.
Critics, on the other hand, argue that the move could sideline voters in districts that lean Democratic, effectively muffling their voices in presidential elections. But proponents are standing firm, saying it’s all about aligning with the founding fathers’ intentions and ensuring Nebraska presents a united front. Keep your eyes on Nebraska. It might just be the battleground state that decides the fate of the nation.
Leave a Comment