In the latest twist of political intrigue, a law professor from George Washington University has floated a provocative idea: replace Kamala Harris with someone else people are very familiar with already. The proposed running mate is none other than former President Barack Obama on the 2024 ticket. As Joe Biden’s mental acuity continues to be a hot topic of debate, this suggestion has turned heads and ignited heated discussions.
John Banzhaf, the legal scholar behind this proposal, argues that an Obama-Biden ticket would have a significantly better chance of defeating former President Donald Trump in the upcoming election. “Barack Obama is probably one of the few persons whom a majority of Americans would want and trust as president,” Banzhaf asserted, adding that while the plan might seem radical, it could be the Democrats’ best shot at securing another term in the White House.
The crux of Banzhaf’s argument hinges on constitutional interpretation. Critics might be quick to cite the 22nd Amendment as a roadblock, which states, “No person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice.” However, Banzhaf contends that this language does not explicitly preclude Obama from being elected as vice president and subsequently ascending to the presidency through succession rather than election. “While this amendment may bar Obama from ‘being elected’ to the office of president again, it obviously and by its clear language doesn’t prohibit him from being elected as vice president,” he explained.
Banzhaf’s proposal, while legally intriguing, also underscores the desperation some feel within the Democratic Party. With Biden’s recent debate performance raising eyebrows and Harris struggling to gain traction among voters, the idea of bringing back Obama—a figure still widely beloved within the party—might seem like a Hail Mary pass. But is it one that’s even remotely feasible or advisable?
To say the suggestion has raised some eyebrows would be an understatement. Skeptics argue that such a move would not only be unprecedented but could also spark a constitutional crisis. Even if Banzhaf’s legal interpretations hold water, the political ramifications would be enormous. For one, it would signal a lack of confidence in the current administration’s ability to win on its own merits. Moreover, it risks alienating segments of the electorate who might view the maneuver as a cynical ploy to cling to power.
Nevertheless, the idea has sparked a lively debate about the lengths to which the Democrats might go to retain the presidency. Could Obama, who has often stated his desire to remain out of the political fray post-presidency, be coaxed back into the spotlight? And even if he were willing, would the American public accept such an unconventional ticket?
While Banzhaf’s proposal might seem outlandish, it does reveal a broader truth about the current political landscape: the stakes are incredibly high, and conventional wisdom is constantly being challenged.
Leave a Comment