Senator Lisa Murkowski has a talent for finding the one exception to every rule, and then trying to build the entire policy around it. This week’s episode revolves around the SAVE America Act, a bill aimed at tightening election integrity by requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to vote. Pretty basic concept, at least to anyone who thinks voting in American elections should be reserved for American citizens.
Murkowski, however, decided to plant herself firmly on the other side of that idea. In fact, she stood alone as the only Republican senator to vote against advancing the bill. That alone tells you something is off, because it is not exactly a controversial position within her party to support voter verification.
Her reasoning, though, is where things really go sideways. According to Murkowski, the requirement to prove citizenship could disenfranchise elderly Alaska Natives living in remote villages, particularly those without birth certificates. That is the scenario she keeps pointing to, as if the entire integrity of U.S. elections hinges on a very specific and limited situation in one state.
So what is her solution? Instead of finding a targeted way to help those individuals obtain documentation, she proposed an amendment that would exempt anyone born before 1961 from having to prove citizenship at all. That is not a surgical fix, that is blowing a hole in the entire premise of the bill.
Think about the logic for a second. If someone is capable of registering and casting a ballot, they can handle the process of proving who they are. The idea that an entire age group should be waved through without verification raises more questions than it answers. Most obvious among them, how exactly do you confirm someone was born before 1961 without some form of identification? It is the kind of circular reasoning that makes bureaucratic nonsense famous.
Murkowski did not stop there. She also floated another amendment that would allow states to opt out of the law entirely if they can show that noncitizen voting occurs at a rate lower than 0.05 percent. In other words, if the problem is small enough, just ignore it. That is not exactly a compelling argument for maintaining election integrity.
During her Senate floor remarks, Murkowski leaned heavily on Alaska’s unique geography, noting that many communities are not connected by roads and that access to election offices is limited. Those challenges are real, but they are not new, and they do not justify carving out sweeping exemptions that undermine a national standard.
At its core, this debate is not complicated. Either you believe citizenship verification matters in federal elections, or you believe it is optional depending on circumstances. Murkowski’s approach tries to split that difference, and in doing so, ends up weakening the very safeguards the SAVE America Act is designed to put in place.
Washington has a long history of overcomplicating simple issues, and this feels like another entry on that list.
Leave a Comment