In the world of politics, it is not uncommon for parties to employ various tactics to gain an advantage over their opponents. One such tactic is the deliberate exclusion of a candidate’s name from the ballot. The Democratic Party has a history of using this strategy, as exemplified by their attempt to prevent Abraham Lincoln from appearing on the ballot during the 1860 presidential election.
The year was 1860, a pivotal moment in American history. The nation was on the verge of the Civil War, and the presidential election held significant implications for the future of the United States. The Republicans had nominated Abraham Lincoln as their candidate, while the Democrats were divided among several candidates. In an attempt to undermine Lincoln’s chances of victory, Democrats in Southern states refused to include his name on the ballot.
Despite the Democrats’ efforts, Abraham Lincoln emerged as the victor in the 1860 presidential election. While his name was absent from the ballots in most Southern states, Lincoln secured a plurality of the popular vote in the rest of the country. This outcome demonstrated the resilience of the Republican Party and the determination of the American people to elect their chosen leader.
Following the Civil War, the Republicans passed the 14th Amendment in 1868, with the aim of guaranteeing equal protection under the law for the newly freed slaves. Notably, this amendment played a crucial role in the Democrats’ recent attempt to remove President Trump’s name from the Colorado ballot.
In a surprising twist, far-left justices in the Colorado Supreme Court invoked the 14th Amendment to justify their decision to exclude President Trump from the ballot in 2024. It is worth noting that no Democrats had voted in favor of the amendment during its enactment. This ironic use of a post-Civil War amendment by Democrats raises questions about their intentions and motivations.
The Democrats’ latest maneuver bears striking resemblance to their actions in the 1860 presidential election. Just as they attempted to prevent Abraham Lincoln’s name from appearing on the ballot, they now seek to block President Trump from running for office. Despite the significant historical and political differences between these two situations, the underlying motive remains the same: to stifle opposition and manipulate the electoral process.
In their bid to remove President Trump from the ballot, Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans have turned to the events of January 6, 2021, as evidence of his alleged engagement in insurrection and rebellion against the U.S. government. They point to the actions of some protesters during the Capitol incursion as justification for their claims.
While the Democrats make bold accusations against President Trump, their argument is built on shaky ground. The burden of proof lies with them to demonstrate that his actions on January 6 constitute insurrection or rebellion as defined by the 14th Amendment. However, the available evidence fails to establish a direct link between the former president and the violent actions of a select few.
Ironically, the Democratic Party, with its historical association with slavery and the Ku Klux Klan, now finds itself attempting to block a candidate from the ballot. The same party that fought against the emancipation of slaves in the past is now using legal maneuvers to suppress political opponents. This historical irony underscores the shifting dynamics and motivations within the Democratic Party.
With the Democrats’ attempt to remove President Trump from the ballot in Colorado, Minnesota, and Michigan, the responsibility now falls on the Supreme Court to uphold the principles of democracy. It is essential for the highest court in the land to carefully consider the historical context, legal implications, and constitutional rights at stake in these cases.
Leave a Comment