At this point, I’m sure you’ve seen the news about the “exploding pagers” that Israel supposedly deployed against Hamas. This story has gained significant attention across various news outlets, and we’ve all covered it in one way or another. But let’s be honest, there’s a crucial aspect of this story that’s flying under the radar, and we need to address it right now.
One thing that I thought of was who even uses pagers still besides doctors? To be honest, I didn’t even think they still manufactured them. It feels bizarre, right? In an era dominated by smartphones and instant communication through various apps, the idea of reverting to pagers seems almost archaic. But I suspect this ties into a part of the narrative that’s being conveniently ignored, except for one man…Mike Adams, who has been vocal about the implications of this technology choice. His perspective sheds light on the potential motivations behind using such an outdated device in a critical situation, prompting deeper questions about strategy and communication in modern conflict.
Here’s Mike’s very interesting perspective on the matter:
Mike suggests that this issue wasn’t merely a one-off modification to the pagers intended to make them blow up. He warns that this can be executed remotely, essentially employing sophisticated software to manipulate lithium-ion batteries, leading them to overheat and ultimately explode.
Maybe they chose pagers specifically because they wanted to foster the perception that it’s just happening over there in the Middle East with their outdated technology, and could never happen here. But don’t be so sure. According to Mike, the reality is that it absolutely could. The risk is more prevalent than we might want to believe, highlighting the need for awareness and vigilance regarding the technology we use every day.
Now, imagine a sinister group or government decides they want to target only devices owned by conservatives or supporters of President Trump. You think they couldn’t pull that off?
Leave a Comment